menu
Click to close

Call Us Today
1-800-900-5556

facebook youtube

Compare Pulse Magnetic Therapy Machines

vs image

Our FREE Buyers Guide*

iMRS 2000 vs MAS PEMF

standard imrs mobile separator

Features*

iMRS 2000

MAS PEMF

#1 - Earth Frequenies

#2 - Biorhythm Clock

#3 - Higher Intensity Pain

#4 - Sensitive Setting

#5 - Graduated Intensity

#6 - Pure Pulsating Fields

#7 - Sawtooth Wave

only on most expensive

#8 - NASA Square Wave

only on most expensive

#9 - Switch Polarity

?

#10 - Light and Sound Option

#11 - Biofeedback

#12 - Digital/Easy Upgrade

#13- Database Protocols

#14 - FDA Registered

#15 - Company Progressive

#16 - Good Value

#17 - 3 year Warranty

#18 - Mat Comfortable?

#19 - Excellent Training /Support


Best in Industry

Warranty

3 years w/ Extended

3 years

Applicators

Whole Body Mat, Pillow

Whole Body Mat, Pillow

Accessories

Probe, iSLRS, iMORE, Iguide+ more

None

Intensities

.09 - 70 uT / up to 300 uT Probe

Up to 1000 uT

Frequency

4 Settings Based on Biorhythms (.5 Hz / 3 Hz / 5.5 Hz / 15 Hz)

.2 - 9999 Hz

Waveform

Sawtooth Mat/ Squarewave Pillow & Probe

Sinusoidal, sawtooth, rectangle, triangle

Cost Basic System

Starts @ $3775

$5,800

FDA Registered?

Manufactured

Germany

Germany

*Download the Free Buyers Guide for more details on the the 19 Features to compare. The buyers guide provides a full explanation on each of these features and why they are important.

Why the iMRS 2000 is Clearly a Better Choice than MAS PEMF

standard imrs mobile separator

The Main Fact is that the key to effective and safe PEMF therapy is Frequency Resonance, Not Intensity - MAS PEMF like other High Intensity and High Voltage systems misses the boat by trying to promote higher intensity is better. The MORE is BETTER MINDSET does NOT apply to PEMF. In fact high intensity systems are potentially dangerous, and cause cellular fatigue and burnout over time.
Make sure to carefully read the Buyers Guide and the NASA PEMF study http://www.imrs2000.com/nasa

Why the iMRS 2000 is Clearly a Better Choice than MAS PEMF


  • #1Expensive - Have to pay $5800 to get the square wave and sawtooth - and their sawtooth is crude with little variation.

  • #2 Their signals are too simplistic which leads to habituation and fatigue over time (like static magnetics, they have to compensate with raising the intensity)

  • #3 Old 1990's control unit - Not digital, programmable and not upgradeable - No intelligence built in

  • #4 Can only use one frequency at a time - Sisken Walker showed all the different tissues resonate to different frequencies - iMRS sawtooth delivers bunches of frequencies simultaneously.

  • #5 No iGUIDE database of protocols

  • #6 No iMORE biofeedback, you have to rely on "guesswork" with the MAS system

  • #7 Big, heavy, bulky and not easy to travel with (Control unit is HUGE and really outdated , and mat is super heavy)

  • #8 Local applicator is heavy and hard to administer

  • #9 NO PROBE for pin pointed accuracy

Make Sure to Read the Article on the Myths of High Intensity Systems

fda
iso
mdc
iec
health canada
oz

Copyright@ All right reserved by imrs2000.com 1998-2018.

Visit desktop site: www.imrs2000.com

Disclaimer: These statements have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug
Administration. This product is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any
disease. If you are pregnant, nursing, taking medication, or have a medical condition,
consult your physician before using this product. This information is not intended as
medical advice and may not be used as medical advice. It should not be used to replace
the advice of your own doctor.

Web Design & SEO by Kardash & Sons